A reaction paper is a type of written assignment, which requires personal opinion and conclusions on a given article or abstract. Unlike a summary, a reaction paper should contain your own thoughts on the problem, discussed in the original text.
Decide on a topic It will help you considerably if your topic for your literature review is the one on which you intend to do your final M.
However, you may pick any scholarly topic. Identify the literature that you will review: Familiarize yourself with online databases see UMD library resource links below for help with thisidentifying relevant databases in your field of study.
Using relevant databases, search for literature sources using Google Scholar and also searching using Furl search all sources, including the Furl accounts of other Furl members.
Some tips for identifying suitable literature and narrowing your search: Start with a general descriptor from the database thesaurus or one that you know is already a well defined descriptor based on past work that you have done in this field. You will need to experiment with different searches, such as limiting your search to descriptors that appear only in the document titles, or in both the document title and in the abstract.
Redefine your topic if needed: Try to narrow it to a specific area of interest within the broad area that you have chosen remember: It is a good idea, as part of your literature search, to look for existing literature reviews that have already been written on this topic.
Import your references into your RefWorks account see: Refworks Import Directions for guide on how to do this from different databases.
You can also enter references manually into RefWorks if you need to. Analyze the literature Once you have identified and located the articles for your review, you need to analyze them and organize them before you begin writing: Skim the articles to get an idea of the general purpose and content of the article focus your reading here on the abstract, introduction and first few paragraphs, the conclusion of each article.
You can take notes onto note cards or into a word processing document instead or as well as using RefWorks, but having your notes in RefWorks makes it easy to organize your notes later.
Group the articles into categories e. Once again, it's useful to enter this information into your RefWorks record.
You can record the topics in the same box as before User 1 or use User 2 box for the topic s under which you have chosen to place this article. Decide on the format in which you will take notes as you read the articles as mentioned above, you can do this in RefWorks.
You can also do this using a Word Processor, or a concept mapping program like Inspiration free 30 trial downloada data base program e. Access or File Maker Proin an Excel spreadsheet, or the "old-fashioned" way of using note cards.
Be consistent in how you record notes. Note key statistics that you may want to use in the introduction to your review.
APA Cheat Sheet 6th edition, Page Setup o 1” on every side of the document o Double-spaced; no extra spaces between paragraphs o 12 pt font o TWO spaces follow punctuation What an APA . The article accurately describes each kind of format style and is a great guide to each type of commonly used reference. One thing in particular that I would like to re-emphasize is that an essay without structure is not an essay at all. Many Social Science disciplines use APA format for citing sources. The most recent guide is the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association 6th benjaminpohle.com our additional page to format in-text or parenthetical citations.
Select useful quotes that you may want to include in your review. If you copy the exact words from an article, be sure to cite the page number as you will need this should you decide to use the quote when you write your review as direct quotes must always be accompanied by page references.
The rule I follow is to quote only when some key meaning would be lost in translation if I were to paraphrase the original author's words, or if using the original words adds special emphasis to a point that I am making. Since different research studies focus on different aspects of the issue being studied, each article that you read will have different emphases, strengths.
Your role as a reviewer is to evaluate what you read, so that your review is not a mere description of different articles, but rather a critical analysis that makes sense of the collection of articles that you are reviewing.
Critique the research methodologies used in the studies, and distinguish between assertions the author's opinion and actual research findings derived from empirical evidence. Identify major trends or patterns: As you read a range of articles on your topic, you should make note of trends and patterns over time as reported in the literature.
This step requires you to synthesize and make sense of what you read, since these patterns and trends may not be spelled out in the literature, but rather become apparent to you as you review the big picture that has emerged over time. Your analysis can make generalizations across a majority of studies, but should also note inconsistencies across studies and over time.
Identify gaps in the literature, and reflect on why these might exist based on the understandings that you have gained by reading literature in this field of study. These gaps will be important for you to address as you plan and write your review.
Identify relationships among studies: You may also note that studies fall into different categories categories that you see emerging or ones that are already discussed in the literature. When you write your review, you should address these relationships and different categories and discuss relevant studies using this as a framework.
Keep your review focused on your topic: As you take notes, record which specific aspects of the article you are reading are relevant to your topic as you read you will come up with key descriptors that you can record in your notes that will help you organize your findings when you come to write up your review.
If you are using an electronic form of note taking, you might note these descriptors in a separate field e. Evaluate your references for currency and coverage: Although you can always find more articles on your topic, you have to decide at what point you are finished with collecting new resources so that you can focus on writing up your findings.A guide with information on how to write a literature review.
of master's theses written by CSU, Chico students, from on. Many of these will contain published examples of literature reviews. 24 page free previews, and full-text PDF, if available, for dissertations and theses dating back to Sample APA Paper (lit.
review begins. Book report sample "A True Detective: The Confession of Brother Haluin" will shed light on basic rules which you have to follow while producing your report.
It performs remarkable examples of using "block in-text citations" in APA format. ARTICLE SUMMARY EXAMPLE Your Name Here A study by Tantleff-Dunn and Thompson () examined body image and its impact on NOTE: THE REVIEW OF PAST LITERATURE SHOULD INCLUDE THE LINK BETWEEN THE STUDIES CITED AND THE Microsoft Word - APA Article Summary Example_rev benjaminpohle.com Author.
Qualitative Article Critique Paper details: Attached are the guidelines to develop the review, plus the article that need to be used Guidelines for Qualitative Nursing Research Critique Analyze and critique a quantitative nursing research article from a nursing research journal published within the past 5 years.
The American Psychological Association or APA Writing Format is one of the most widely used formats in writing academic papers, particularly in the field of science. This article is a part of the guide. How To Critique A Journal Article Sponsored by The Center for Teaching and Learning at UIS Last Edited 4/9/ Page 1 of 2 writing on this point.) How To Critique A Journal Article Sponsored by The Center for Teaching and Learning at UIS Last Edited 4/9/ Page 2 of 2 .