Print this page What is Euthanasia? A person who undergoes euthanasia usually has an incurable condition. But there are other instances where some people want their life to be ended.
Expressing the views of his fellow justices, Chief Justice Rehnquist wrote, "Americans are engaged in an earnest and profound debate about the morality, legality, and practicality of physician-assisted suicide.
Our holding permits this debate to continue.
The important questions are addressed here, including: What does mercy dictate? Does physician-assisted suicide honor or violate autonomy?
Is it more dignified than natural death? Is this decision purely a private matter? Will legalizing physician-assisted suicide put us on a slippery slope toward involuntary euthanasia? And, in an analysis of data not available in any other book, what can we learn from Holland, the only country in which physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia are legal?
|It frees up hospital beds and resources||For example, it will be difficult to deal with people who want to implement euthanasia for selfish reasons or pressurise vulnerable patients into dying. This is little different from the position with any crime.|
|Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law||The first apparent usage of the term "euthanasia" belongs to the historian Suetoniuswho described how the Emperor Augustus"dying quickly and without suffering in the arms of his wife, Livia, experienced the 'euthanasia' he had wished for. In particular, these include situations where a person kills another, painlessly, but for no reason beyond that of personal gain; or accidental deaths that are quick and painless, but not intentional.|
|Project MUSE - Religious Ethics and Active Euthanasia in a Pluralistic Society||Ethical Key Issues - Euthanasia A Duty to Die With rising healthcare costs, and an aging population, if euthanasia or assisted suicide is legalised, disability activists fear that voluntary euthanasia will soon give way to involuntary or coerced euthanasia.|
Regulating How We Die will be essential reading for anyone who has been handed a terminal diagnosis, for people close to those facing such a diagnosis, for professionals, including physicians, nurses, pastors, lawyers, legislators--indeed, for anyone who has considered the moral and political debate over doctor-assisted suicide.The debate over 'personhood' is crucial to the issue of euthanasia.
Some bioethicists claim that any cognatively impaired human would qualify as a non-person, while others claim that the only living non-persons are Persistent Vegetative State 'PVS' individuals, anencephalics, and probably foetuses.
Regulating How We Die will be essential reading for anyone who has been handed a terminal diagnosis, for people close to those facing such a diagnosis, for professionals, including physicians, nurses, pastors, lawyers, legislators--indeed, for anyone who has considered the 2/5(1).
Chief Justice William Rehnquist wrote, "Throughout the nation, Americans are engaged in an earnest and profound debate about the morality, legality and practicality of physician-assisted suicide.
Morality and Practicality of Euthanasia Euthanasia is defined by The American Heritage Dictionary as "the action of killing an individual for reasons considered to be merciful" (Leonesio ). Here, killing is described as the physical action where one individual actively kills an.
Throughout the Nation, Americans are engaged in an earnest and profound debate about the morality, legality, and practicality of physician-assisted suicide.
Our holding permits this debate to continue, as it should in a democratic society.
This little book provides an ideal occasion to comment on the structure of the debate over euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide, a debate that has been developing over the past ten years or so in medical, academic, and public circles; indeed, this little book is a virtually perfect specimen for showing what is going on in these debates.